Staff Reports
Estimating Probabilities of Default
July 2004 Number 190
JEL classification: G21, G28, C16

Author: Til Schuermann and Samuel Hanson

We conduct a systematic comparison of confidence intervals around estimated probabilities of default (PD), using several analytical approaches from large-sample theory and bootstrapped small-sample confidence intervals. We do so for two different PD estimation methods—cohort and duration (intensity)—using twenty-two years of credit ratings data. We find that the bootstrapped intervals for the duration-based estimates are surprisingly tight when compared with the more commonly used (asymptotic) Wald interval. We find that even with these relatively tight confidence intervals, it is impossible to distinguish notch-level PDs for investment grade ratings—for example, a PDAA- from a PDA+. However, once the speculative grade barrier is crossed, we are able to distinguish quite cleanly notch-level estimated default probabilities. Conditioning on the state of the business cycle helps; it is easier to distinguish adjacent PDs in recessions than in expansions.

Available only in PDFPDF36 pages / 374 kb

For a published version of this report, see Til Schuermann and Samuel Hanson, "Confidence Intervals for Probabilities of Default," Journal of Banking and Finance 30, no. 8 (August 2006): 2281-301.

tools
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Statement. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Statement.   Close