|Home > Research > Research Publications|
Current Issues in Economics and Finance
Second District Highlights
Job Declines in New York–New Jersey Region to Slow in 2003; Modest Growth Seen for 2004
|July 2003 Volume 9, Number 7||
|JEL classification: R10, R12||
Employment in the New YorkNew Jersey region will decline in 2003but only slightlyand the region's economy is poised to rebound in 2004 with 1 percent growth, or a gain of 128,000 jobs. Continued expansion in the national economy and sustained vigor in the financial markets, however, will be essential to a favorable employment outlook.
Employment in the New York-New Jersey region fell for a second straight year in 2002. By February 2003, private sector employment was down nearly 390,000 jobs, or about 3.6 percent, from its peak at the end of 2000. This drop was just slightly more than half the size of the region's job decline during the 1989-92 downturn, but as a share of total employment, it exceeded the comparable nationwide decline by almost a percentage point. And while employment levels have edged up in recent months, the job count remains substantially below its cyclical peak.
The downturn in regional employment has occurred in several distinct phases. Many of the job losses took place during 2001, when the area met with a series of adverse developments. Failing dot-coms, the weakening stock market, and a slowing volume of initial public stock offerings began to weigh down growth both directly and through their impact on the professional and business services supporting these activities. The national recession that began in March 2001 compounded this weakness, and growth turned negative around midyear. The pace of decline picked up in the fourth quarter of the year and into early 2002 as a result of job losses associated with the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center. However, during 2002, that pace slowed considerably in New York and New Jersey and, for the past year, job losses on a year-over-year basis have moved more or less in step with the nation's moderate pace of decline.
Within the region, major job losses were concentrated in New York City. After expanding at a rate substantially higher than the national rate in 1999 and 2000, employment in the city fell sharply in 2001, reflecting New York City's position at the center of the financial markets, the dot-com demise, and the disruptions owing to 9/11. Although the city's job declines were still much less severe than they were during the 1989-92 downturn, employment as of February 2003 had fallen by roughly 225,000 from its cyclical peak at the end of 2000. Job losses in New York State as a whole were much less dramatic during this downturn because New York City's suburbs fared relatively well. Despite the recession, several suburban areas continued to generate modest job gains through 2001 and then declined only negligibly in 2002. In New Jersey, employment decreased only modestly in 2001, and levels have remained essentially unchanged for much of the past two years.
Looking ahead, we expect that the level of employment will continue to edge up over the remainder of 2003 and that the region will post a modest 0.3 percent decline in jobs for the year overall. This relative improvement takes into account the Blue Chip Consensus forecast that the national growth rate of real, or inflation-adjusted, GDP in 2003 will not slow from the 2.4 percent rate achieved in 2002,1 and assumes that broad stock market measures such as the S&P 500 will at a minimum not fall below their June 2003 averages. A forecasted further pickup in the national growth rate of real GDP to 3.6 percent in 2004 and some acceleration in financial market activity are projected to push regional job growth to 1.0 percent next year.
In this edition of Second District Highlights, we analyze employment trends in the New York-New Jersey region over the past two years and present our forecast for job growth in New York City, New York State as a whole, and New Jersey in 2003 and 2004. In addition, we describe the structure of employment in the region according to the new North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) introduced by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics (see box). This new system reorganizes the previous industry classification sectors and introduces several new classifications, including an information sector and a leisure and hospitality (tourism) sector, that capture job trends in industries that are key forces in the evolution of the region's employment. Some risks to the region that could affect our employment outlook are also considered.
Review of Regional Employment Developments
The region's job losses resulting from the attack on 9/11 compounded the national downturn's impact on employment. Between October and December 2001, jobs diminished by 75,000 in New York City, with losses occurring largely in industries directly and indirectly affected by the attack, such as finance, hotels, transportation, and segments of the retail trade sector.3 At the end of 2001, these declines had contributed to a 3.0 percent reduction in the region's private sector employment from the year-earlier level, compared with a 1.8 percent drop nationwide. Among the major industries, only education and health care added jobs in significant numbers. In the public sector, a modest acceleration in the growth of state and local government employment gave limited support to overall employment.
During 2002 and through May 2003, the pace of year-over-year employment declines in the region moderated considerably as the losses associated with 9/11 receded gradually over 2002 and the national economy strengthened.4 Employment in the region's finance sector generally stabilized, but losses in professional and business services employment continued, although at a sharply reduced pace. Construction employment picked up modestly, and although manufacturing continued its well-established trend of contraction and relocation, the pace of losses in this sector moderated substantially. Transportation and utilities saw job losses bottom out while retail trade saw solid job gains. Education and health care jobs continued to expand in 2002, although at a modestly slower pace. Employment growth in the public sector stalled.
New York State
Employment weakness appeared initially in finance, particularly among commercial and investment banks and securities firms, and in computer-related services; much of the weakness was concentrated in New York City. At the time of the attack, employment in New York State had already fallen 1.0 percent from its year-earlier level. In the quarter following 9/11, private sector employment fell by 3.2 percent, or 235,000 jobs, from its level in the comparable period in 2000. The declines persisted into early 2002, but began to lessen significantly as the year progressed. By the end of 2002, employment in the state was just 0.9 percent below the year-earlier level. As of May 2003, the decline had lessened to just 0.6 percent below the year-ago level, buoyed by sustained vigor in health care and social services employment; a modest pickup in trade, transportation, and utilities jobs; and the stabilization of finance sector employment.
This relative improvement in 2003 masks a wide variation in job growth trends across the state. New York City accounted for fully two-thirds of the state's job losses in the current downturnmore than its share of employment. Its suburbs, however, benefited from the robust growth enjoyed by the city in the late 1990s, and they lost proportionately fewer jobs to the recession and the 9/11 attack.6 Job declines in western New York were relatively mild, although the area continues to be weighed down by the ongoing contraction in manufacturing jobs and the struggle to attract new industries.7
New York City
The attack on the World Trade Center further undermined the city's employment growth; the ensuing job losses were widespread and included significant hits to leisure and hospitality; trade, transportation, and utilities; airlines; professional and business services; and finance.
The rate of decline in manufacturing spiked from 5.4 percent in 2000 to more than 12.0 percent in 2001. That year, manufacturers in the city gave up more than 20,000 jobs. By year-end 2001, the city had lost nearly 5.0 percent of its job base. The rate of loss slowed in 2002; by May 2003, the year-over-year decline in jobs had decelerated further, to 1.6 percent. The slowing rate of decline is an improvement in the economic picture, but the level of employment remains well below its prior peak and has yet to show any sustained rise.
Two recent indicators of improvement in the city's finance sector are worth noting. The first comes from a report on domestic pretax profits in the securities industry.8 According to the report, securities firms tripled their pretax profits to $3.5 billion in the first quarter of 2003 from $1.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2002. The improvement was narrowly based on strong revenue growth from their fixed-income and energy-related trading businesses. A broader revenue recovery may be necessary to spur job growth in this sector, but this advance suggests that incentives for layoffs are lessening. Significantly, preliminary data for the second quarter suggest that a broader based recovery has begun, with revenue growth spreading to most business lines while volume-related wages rise for some lines. The second indicator of finance sector improvement comes from reports by several major commercial banks that strong revenue growth had generated healthy profits.9 Layoffs due to restructurings, mergers, and acquisitions among commercial banks were responsible for significant job losses over the past two years, but such profit strength may signal an end to these layoffs.
Private sector employment in the current cycle peaked in December 2000, then declined by 1.4 percent, or 55,000 jobs, over 2001. Employment remained relatively flat through February 2003 and has since begun to recover. This relatively mild pace of losses has matched or exceeded performance at the national level. Government jobs have continued to expand since 2001, helping to support overall employment.
Employment in the state was subject to some of the same adverse conditions affecting other parts of the region, including the new-media bust, the weakness in manufacturing, and the retrenchment in telecommunications. Although employment in these sectors continues to decline, the rate of decline has slowed and the major job losses appear to be over.
Much of the immediate impact of 9/11 on jobs in New Jersey also appears to have subsided.10 Moreover, the state experienced only mild losses in professional and business services, and employment levels in this key sector have expanded modestly in recent months. Declines in transportation and utilities appear to have bottomed out, and growth in the leisure and hospitality sector, which had stalled in 2002, is again picking up. Jobs in education and health care expanded throughout the downturn and are growing at a month-to-month annualized pace of roughly 4.0 percent. Employment in retail trade has bounced back and is expanding at an annualized clip of 2.0 percent; jobs in construction, although off their healthy pace of previous years, are showing mild gains.
Forecast for 2003 and 2004
Underlying this projected improvement is the Blue Chip Consensus forecast of a year-over-year 2.4 percent rate of aggregate economic growth in 2003a rate that matches the 2002 pace and signals the continuation of the national recovery. The projected improvement also reflects the assumption that financial markets will at a minimum maintain the gains of roughly 10 percent achieved by S&P 500 stocks in the first six months of this year.11 The services sector will be the region's engine of job growth: professional and business services will see losses moderate, and education and health care services and leisure and hospitality services will continue their solid expansion. Job shrinkage in finance is expected to end and could reverse by year-end given the stabilization of the financial markets. The manufacturing and information sectors will continue to see significant job losses, yet at a moderately slower pace than in 2002.
In 2004, growth is projected to reach 1.0 percent (see table), resulting in the net creation of 128,000 jobs. The recovery in employment will be supported by the expected acceleration in national growth to 3.6 percent that year.12 Also projected for 2004 is a modest continuation of the improvement in financial market activity that will generate some job growth in the region's finance sector and in supporting services in many other sectors. Overall, services jobs will again be the major source of growth, spurred by a relatively strong bounce-back in professional and business services. This sector will respond both to the rising demand stemming from the strengthening national economy and the improving finance sector and to gradually improving local demand. Trade, transportation, and utilities will add a significant number of jobs while construction will expand moderately. The information sector is expected to stabilize in 2004, but jobs in manufacturing will continue to contract in light of this sector's long-term structural decline. An anticipated pickup in local government jobs will add to a modest expansion of public sector employment.
New York State
Financial employment outside New York City is likely to grow modestly in 2004 as general economic activity rises. Construction employment is projected to accelerate in 2004 with the overall economic pickup and with progress in the planning process for 9/11 reconstruction. The education and health care sector, which expanded throughout the recession, appears likely to stick to that pattern through 2003 and 2004, although the rate of job growth in health care may moderate, given state budget constraints.
New York City
For 2004, we see a 0.6 percent expansion. Professional and business services and information are the two sectors likely to emerge as the key sources of growth. Professional and business servicesa sector that includes computer analysts and systems developers and that served as a wellspring of the city's job growth in the 1990sshould see an intensification of demand as the national economy picks up. Since the city has a high concentration of professional and business jobs, the increased demand will help spur overall economic growth. Much of the city's employment in the information sector is in the headquarter operations of TV broadcasting, news syndication, cable programming, newspaper publishing, and motion picture production. The demand for these services will also be sensitive to an improving national economy.
A sustained rebound in the stock market and pretax profits could lead to a broader rally in securities industry employment, since greater financial market activity has historically been associated with expanded financial employment, as well as with an increased demand for banking services, legal services, advertising and marketing services, real estate, and leisure and hospitality services.13 Significantly, preliminary data for the second quarter of 2003 suggest that a broad-based recovery in revenues may be under way, and the securities industry now anticipates that pretax profits may nearly double to $15 billion in 2003 from $8.1 billion in 2002.14
Leisure and hospitality jobs have benefited from the upturn in domestic tourism in 2003, but they remain constrained by the dramatic decline in domestic business travel and international travel. However, a strengthening national economy is likely to boost demand for these services and provide an impetus for growth. Some deceleration in the growth of health care services employment may occur but, on balance, the level of employment in health care and education is still likely to advance at a moderate pace given the continued underlying demand. Manufacturing employment is expected to continue its long-term secular decline, but the construction sector and the trade, transportation, and utilities sector are likely to expand, reflecting a strengthening in regional and national demand.
In 2004, job growth in the state will most likely accelerate, to 1.4 percent, with roughly 58,000 new jobs created. The rebound reflects faster paced growth in services employment, especially professional and business services, and a modest expansion in the construction sector and the trade, transportation, and utilities sector. The finance sector should see some job gains owing to the general improvement in financial market activity and a return to the sector's longer term trend of moderate growth in New Jersey.
We caution, however, that the uncertain extent of the rally in financial market activity remains an important risk to the region, particularly to New York City, and a slower than projected rebound in national growth would provide less impetus to the regional economy. In addition, the downturn experienced by the region has strained state and local government budgets, and tax increases and expenditure cuts have been imposed to balance the budgets. Should job growth be slower than projected, the fiscal stress could intensify. The challenge then facing policymakers would be to address these fiscal demands without harming the New York-New Jersey region's long-term growth potential. However, should a more rapid recovery develop in the financial markets or should the national pickup gather steam, the outlook for job growth and regional budget issues would brighten.
|About the Authors
James Orr is a research officer and Rae Rosen an assistant vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
2. "Professional and business services" and "information" are two of the new NAICS sectors. The information sector includes publishing, telecommunications, and Internet and related businesses. It represents a large segment of the new-media industryone that had not been well defined until now.
3. See Bram, Orr, and Rapaport (2002) for details on the attack's impact on New York City employment; Bram (2003) provides estimates of the separate effects of the attack and the national recession on the city's job trends.
4. See Bram (2003).
5. The CEI is a single composite measure
used to track economic activity and to date business cycles.
Indexes for New York State, New York City,
and New Jersey can be found at <http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/regional_economy/
6. For example, the Albany, Dutchess, and Nassau-Suffolk labor markets declined just 0.4 percent, to 0.6 percent, in 2002 while employment in the Newburgh area rose 0.6 percent. Jobs in the suburban counties of Rockland, Putnam, and Westchester fell about 1.0 percent in 2001 and were essentially flat in 2002.
7. See Deitz and Garcia (2001).
10. In the months following the attack, about 15,000 jobs in New York City's finance sector relocated to New Jersey. We estimate that about one-third of them returned to the city in 2002. The state appears to have retained the other two-thirds, and has added modestly to them over the past year.
11. See Blue Chip Economic Indicators (2003).
12. See Blue Chip Economic Indicators (2003).
13. See Bram and Orr (1999).
14. These data are publicly available from the Securities Industry Association.
American Banker. 2003. "J.P. Morgan Chase's Numbers Impress the Street," July 17, p. 3.
Blue Chip Economic Indicators. 2003. Vol. 28, no. 6 (June 10).
Bram, Jason. 2003. "New York City's Economy before and after September 11." Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance 9, no. 2 (February).
Bram, Jason, and James Orr. 1999. Can New York City Bank on Wall Street? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance 5, no. 11 (July).
Bram, Jason, James Orr, and Carol Rapaport. 2002. Measuring the Effects of the September 11 Attack on New York City. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 8, no. 2 (November): 5-20.
Deitz, Richard, and Ramon Garcia. 2001. "Economic Restructuring in Western New York State." Regional Economy of Upstate New York. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Buffalo Branch, fall.
New York Times. 2003. "Citigroup and Bank of America Report Healthy Profits. Could This Be the Start of Something Big?" July 15, p. C11.
Orr, James, Robert Rich, and Rae Rosen. 1999. Two New Indexes Offer a Broad View of Economic Activity in the New YorkNew Jersey Region. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance 5, no. 14 (October).
Securities Industry Association. 2003. SIA Research Reports 4, no. 6 (June 12): 27-32