| Home > Research > Research Publications |
| Staff Reports |
| Dynamic Incentives and the Optimal
Delegation of Political Power |
| Previous title: “The
Politics of Central Bank Independence: A Theory of Pandering and Learning in Government” |
| March 2005 Number
205 Revised November 2006 |
JEL classification: E58, E61, H11, J45 |
| Authors: Gauti Eggertsson and Eric Le Borgne We propose a theory to explain why, and under
what circumstances, a politician delegates policy tasks to a technocrat
in an independent institution, and analyze under what conditions delegation
is optimal for society. Our theory builds on Holmström's hidden effort
principal-agent model. The election pressures faced by politicians, together
with the absence of such pressures for technocrats, give rise to a dynamic
incentive structure that formalizes two rationales for delegation, one advanced
in the eighteenth century by Alexander Hamilton and the other in a 1998 work
by Blinder. Delegation trades off the cost of having a possibly incompetent
technocrat with a long-term job contract against the benefit of having a
technocrat who (i) invests more effort into the specialized policy task and
(ii) is better insulated from shifts in public opinion. A natural application
of our framework leads to a new theory of central bank independence. |
||
|
