Authors: Andreas Fuster, Greg Kaplan, and Basit Zafar
-
-
-
The mission of the Applied Macroeconomics and Econometrics Center (AMEC) is to provide intellectual leadership in the central banking community in the fields of macro and applied econometrics.
The Center for Microeconomic Data offers wide-ranging data and analysis on the finances and economic expectations of U.S. households.
The monthly Empire State Manufacturing Survey tracks the sentiment of New York State manufacturing executives regarding business conditions.
This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.
-
-
-
The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.
Need to file a report with the New York Fed? Here are all of the forms, instructions and other information related to regulatory and statistical reporting in one spot.
The New York Fed works to protect consumers as well as provides information and resources on how to avoid and report specific scams.
-
-
-
The New York Fed provides a wide range of payment services for financial institutions and the U.S. government.
The New York Fed offers the Central Banking Seminar and several specialized courses for central bankers and financial supervisors.
The New York Fed has been working with tri-party repo market participants to make changes to improve the resiliency of the market to financial stress.
-
-
-
We are connecting emerging solutions with funding in three areas—health, household financial stability, and climate—to improve life for underserved communities. Learn more by reading our strategy.
The Economic Inequality & Equitable Growth hub is a collection of research, analysis and convenings to help better understand economic inequality.
The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.
-
Staff Reports
What Would You Do with $500? Spending Responses to Gains, Losses, News, and Loans
Number 843
March 2018
March 2018
JEL classification: D12, D14, E21
We use survey questions about spending to investigate features of propensities to consume that are useful for distinguishing between consumption theories. Asking households about their intended spending under various scenarios, we find that 1) responses to unanticipated gains are vastly heterogeneous (either zero or substantially positive), 2) responses to losses are much larger and more widespread than responses to gains, and 3) even those with large responses to gains do not respond to news about future gains. These three findings suggest that limited access to disposable resources is an important determinant of spending behavior. We also find that households do not respond to the offer of a one-year interest-free loan, suggesting it is unlikely that short-term credit constraints drive high propensities to consume. Furthermore, people do cut spending in response to news about future losses, suggesting that even households with limited disposable resources are somewhat forward-looking. A calibrated two-asset life-cycle precautionary savings model can account for these features of propensities to consume, but it cannot explain the positive effect of windfall size, driven by the extensive margin, on spending responses to gains, which suggests that nonconvexities arising from durability, salience, or attention costs may also be important.
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT(S)
Andreas Fuster
The author declares that he has no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper.
Greg Kaplan
The author makes the following disclosures:
I declare that I have no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper.
The author declares that he has no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper.
Greg Kaplan
The author makes the following disclosures:
- Current primary appointment: Professor, Department of Economics and the College, University of Chicago
- Current additional appointments: Advisory board member, Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; Research Council member, Becker Freidman Institute; advisory board member, NBER Macroeconomics Annual; consultant, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; research associate, National Bureau of Economic Research; international research fellow, Institute for Fiscal Studies
- Previous additional appointments (last five years): Visiting professor, University of New South Wales; economic advisor, Reserve Bank of Australia; editor, Review of Economic Dynamics; consultant, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
- Organizations from which he has received cumulative amounts ≥$10,000 in last five years: University of New South Wales; Reserve Bank of Australia; Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; Center for Monetary and Financial Studies (CEMFI); United States Soccer Federation
I declare that I have no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper.
By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Statement. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Statement. 
