Staff Reports
Reconciling Bagehot with the Fed'€™s Response to September 11
August 2005 Number 217
Revised May 2008
JEL classification: E4, E5, G2

Author: Antoine Martin

The nineteenth-century economist Walter Bagehot maintained that in order to prevent bank panics, a central bank should provide liquidity at a very high rate of interest. However, most of the theoretical literature on liquidity provision suggests that central banks should lend at an interest rate of zero. This latter recommendation is broadly consistent with the Federal Reserve’s behavior in the days following September 11, 2001. This paper shows that Bagehot’s recommendation can be reconciled with the Fed’s policy if one recognizes that Bagehot had in mind a commodity money regime in which the amount of reserves available is limited. A high price for this liquidity allows banks that need it most to self-select. To the contrary, the Fed has a virtually unlimited ability to temporarily expand the money supply so that self-selection is unnecessary.

Available only in PDF PDF40 pages / 273 kb

For a published version of this report, see Antoine Martin, "Reconciling Bagehot and the Fed's Response to September 11," Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 41, no. 2-3 (March-April 2009): 397-415.

By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Statement. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Statement.   Close